Charles Haddon Spurgeon writes that this text "is an invaluable aid to the critical study of the text of the New Testament. You will find in it the ripened results of a matured scholarship, the harvesting of a judgment, generally highly impartial, always worthy of respect, which has gleaned from the most important fields of Biblical research, both modern and ancient, at home and abroad. You will not look here for any spirituality of thought or tenderness of feeling; you will find the learned Dean does not forget to do full justice to his own views, and is quite able to express himself vigorously against his opponents; but for what it professes to be, it is an exceedingly able and successful work.
The later issues are by far the most desirable, as the author has considerably revised the work in the fourth edition.
Online Galleries – Scholastic Art & Writing Awards
What a Way to Go! The extraordinary event made international headlines. The author follows his own translation; his comments "aim to make the results of modern scholarship available to the non-technical reader in a form that it does not require a theological education to understand.
- God’s Love is not Reckless, Contrary to What You Might Sing!
- The End of God?: A Horizon Guide to Science and Religion!
- Bertrand Russells Best (Routledge Classics).
- Through a Chamber Door;
- On Gentle Breeze.
- Postmodern Approaches to the Short Story (Contributions to the Study of World Literature).
Liberal in spots. James Rosscup writes "This work Gnomon , originally issued in , has considerable comment on the Greek, flavoring the effort with judicious details about the spiritual life. Represents Combination of Bengel's Gnomon above and Comments by more modern expositors in brackets to make this more usable for those who do not read Greek. Interprets Mt as fulfilled in 70AD. C H Spurgeon -- "'A Critical New Testament, so compiled as to enable a reader, unacquainted with Greek, to ascertain the exact English force and meaning of the language of the New Testament, and to appreciate the latest results of modern criticism.
We strongly advise the purchase of this book, as it is multum in parvo, and will well repay an attentive perusal. Tischendorf and Alford have contributed largely, with other German and English critics, to make this one of the most lucid and concise commentaries on the text and teachings of the New Testament" Ibid. James Rosscup writes that "In many ways it is the finest and most satisfying overall older commentary on Matthew.
It helps the student on almost every verse. Broadus deals frontally with problems and gives much rich material that throws light on the text.
Supporting the future of creativity since 1923
His citations from other sources are often very helpful. From the standpoint of the Greek text, he is also sound. This work, long a part of the American Commentary on the New Testament series, is still one of the best in detailed explanation of the text where it counts. It is the work of an accomplished conservative scholar. Note : Calvin interprets Mt , 21 ;as fulfilled in 70AD - literal reading of the passage strongly argues against his interpretation. Frequent Illustrations : Below are four examples of illustrations from the notes on Matthew 7 :.
Views Matthew as the fitting connecting link between the Old and New Testaments. Critical problems are not dealt with. The section-by-section interpretation is adapted to the lay Christian reader. Intended for the lay reader. His understanding of the Olivet Discourse is premillennial.
Provides introductory material on the synoptics in relation to each other and individually. The notes provide many illuminating insights for the Greek student.
Due to its age, it does not reflect the latest insights concerning the Greek. Comment : Keener is an outstanding exegete. His commentary is distinctive in its emphasis on the social-historical context of the Gospel. It also contains a very useful page bibliography of secondary resources on the Gospel of Matthew. Click for Another Critique on Keener's commentary on Matthew. It may also be going out of print since it is not available at Westminster Books and is currently available only from Amazon resellers. However, most experts do recommend it with certain caveats. They often do not interpret the prophetic passages such as Matthew 13, 24, 25 from a literal, futuristic perspective See also note below on "Best Commentaries.
I'm against all misuse of drugs and all illegal drugs but this is not the place to discuss that. The Bible suffers greatly from all the wrong stuff that has been justified with it. In such times when people are completely unable to make good and calm religious sense of it, I think it would not be such a bad idea to prohibit the religious use of the Bible altogether.
I seriously think that God could approve of this.
source site But you know, religions go deep to the good things too. I think there's a lot of proper use for it. Mystical theology is not always bad reading either. I am not against weed. Like buying food, for one.
- Robert Scott Leyse.
- Surveys and Assessments.
- Fat and Forty A Weight Loss Success Story Month 2: Simple and Easy Meals (Fat and Forty A Weight Loss Success Story Simple and Easy Meals).
- Jon Graves, contributor to Love Like God, proposes to Lindsey Isham on The View.
- Adventures of a Lightworker: "Dead End Date" by Caroline A. Shearer's Fan Box?
- Jon Graves, a Selected Essay from Love Like God.
I know Christianity is a bit more special than that to you and your circle of friends whatnot. This is fine. As far as I can tell I dont think that you are a bad person. The bible is just philosophy, with some historical links. There are any number of better books on how to be a better person. I see exactly what you mean. That's where we seem to be at this time and this place. People who understand religious language and get the right ideas are being silent because they don't want to show that they belong to "that crowd".
In a better world, the situation will be different. A lot of mistakenness will have to be shown to be mistakenness. Christianity is just a label. A label that trys to say to everyone else 'I am a good person. You can trust me'. It's a label. It means nothing. We dont need it. People know this now, which is usually why they declare atheism. Yes, that is a serious philosophical point, I just mangled the words in that one.
Search Site with Google
To me it's mostly about straightening out the kirkliche neo-cons, really. And you, know I'm being serious about all this. I've studied the lot. Much of what they are doing is just patting the fundamentalist elements in the back. I think it is very true, that if you insist on a thought that is based on ignorance, you will end up with a notion that is at heart already broken. It only takes a little while to fish out the notion from the person who has it, and then another little while to show that it is in fact based on ignorance.
After this, it disappears at once if the person stops insisting on it.
And two or three of the 'preachers' thought they'd do a further service and bring a pound or so of weed out bush with them when conducting services. To flog off at around X5 the usual ammount as to the closest built up area which in itself was expensive. Ignorance that has been insisted on is just an illusion, that really disappears in a blink of an eye.
However, among the young bunch, those circle-dances are just absolutely brilliant in a lot of ways. Are all those 'bouncy' Christian sinalongs really necessary? I fell personally embaressed just being witness to such. A local problem around here is that the protestant Churches are really not interesting enough to be anything more than a joke in the eyes of the people who in fact get the right ideas. This has led to the situation, where a minor lot of kirkliche neo-cons have been successful in convincing some people, that the very good ideas of modern protestantism have been dying out.
But it's not going to take long before the next synthesis wins over. However I'm not sure how it's going to make Churches interesting. Frankly, that is not my job. Um, not trying to be picky or nuffin', but you were saying your dad taught you to let up on your own faults when dispalying angst at anothers? My father just said that thing about "the way grown ups speak sometimes" to calm me down. But I'm not really sure if that has much to do with what was said in Matthew. I completely agree with what you are saying in The thing is, I got this all by myself, whilst actually hating and avoiding Christianity.
Thats my point really. See, as I've been pipin' on about Integrity, you learn all this stuff naturally. Like, really really. It's just a part of growing up. You don't really need to use the bible. However, when you pick up Matthew a, it's a good idea to read as well. It turns out, that the notion of judging that is described here is nothing but very simple moral teaching, nothing really fancy.
It says that if you think about the faults of others, you must be ready to think about all of the faults that you yourself are also guilty of. I mean, of course we need to be able to handle it when we get into proper conversation. Once, after a terrible row with my father, he described this as "the way grown ups discuss things". I was stunned. But at least it explained properly why my uncles have not actually killed each other.
Related Jon Graves, a Selected Essay from Love Like God (Love Like God series)
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved